The response from the scholarly community was swift and highly critical. A detailed historical analysis of Tamil translations explicitly stated that the translator was not only ignorant of the source language, but also actively argued that such knowledge was unnecessary. The same analysis concluded that (Source 2).
Like all scholars who undertake the monumental task of translating sacred text, Dr. Fazlur Rahman faced scrutiny. Literalists sometimes debated his interpretative choices, while linguistic purists debated his use of modern Tamil syntax over classical poetry. However, his work has largely endured as a cornerstone of Tamil Islamic literature. dr fazlur rahman tamil quran exclusive
Tamil is a language rich in literary tradition, but it can also be dense. Dr. Fazlur Rahman was meticulous in choosing words. He avoided mixing excessive Arabic vocabulary where a Tamil equivalent existed, making the text pure and accessible. At the same time, he retained key theological Arabic terms (like Salah , Zakat ) with detailed Tamil footnotes, arguing that these terms carried specific legal and spiritual weights that translation could dilute. The response from the scholarly community was swift